여러분은 우리. Fast2test의PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험자료 즉 덤프의 문제와 답만 있으시면PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor인증시험을 아주 간단하게 패스하실 수 있습니다.그리고 관련 업계에서 여러분의 지위상승은 자연적 이로 이루어집니다. Fast2test의 덤프를 장바구니에 넣으세요. 그리고 Fast2test에서는 무료로 24시간 온라인상담이 있습니다.
| 주제 | 소개 |
|---|---|
| 주제 1 |
|
| 주제 2 |
|
| 주제 3 |
|
| 주제 4 |
|
| 주제 5 |
|
| 주제 6 |
|
>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor최신버전 인기 덤프문제 <<
현재 경쟁울이 심한IT시대에,PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor자격증 취득만으로 이 경쟁이 심한 사회에서 자신만의위치를 보장할수 있고 더욱이는 한층업된 삶을 누릴수 있을수도 있습니다. 우리Fast2test 에서 여러분은PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor관련 학습지도서를 얻을 수 있습니다. 우리Fast2test는 IT업계엘리트 한 강사들이 퍼펙트한PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor문제집을 만들어서 제공합니다. 우리가 제공하는PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor문제와 답으로 여러분은 한번에 성공적으로 시험을 패스 하실수 있습니다. 중요한것 저희 문제집을 선택함으로 여러분의 시간도 절약해드리고 무엇보다도 많은 근심없이 심플하게 시험을 패스하여 좋다는 점입니다.
질문 # 120
Question:
ReePharm, a pharmaceutical company, has decided to incorporate its AI risk management into the information security management system (ISMS) to identify and address risks related to the procurement, manufacturing, and distribution of pharmaceutical products. Is this decision appropriate?
정답：A
설명：
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.1 supportsintegration of AI-specific risk management into broader management systems, provided that AI-specific risks are addressed appropriately. Integration is allowed to improve efficiency without compromising the focus on AI risks.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 6.1 (Risk Management in an Integrated Management System).
질문 # 121
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. During this first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body take the necessary steps to assure the overall competence of the audit team?
정답：B
설명：
Thecertification bodymust ensure that audit team members possess the competencies necessary for the scope and complexity of the audit.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.1states:"The certification body shall have a process for determining the competence required for personnel involved in the management and performance of audits."
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 stresses that audit personnel must haveappropriate knowledge of AI systems and the management system standards.
* TheLead Auditor Training Manualalso explains:"The audit team must collectively possess all the necessary knowledge and skills determined through formal analysis by the certification body." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.
질문 # 122
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Which of the following AI applications for auditing did the audit team employ?
정답：B
설명：
The audit team usedAutomated Data Validationby using AI to gather and validate external digital data (e.g., drug development information).
* ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.2 allows the use ofautomated methodsto collect and validate information, provided that the reliability and integrity of such systems are ensured.
* TheLead Auditor Course Guideexplains:"Automated data validation tools help auditors improve evidence collection efficiency by cross-referencing multiple datasets with minimal manual intervention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2; Lead Auditor Guide Module 5 ("Use of Automated Tools in Audits").
질문 # 123
Scenario 1:
To ensure the integrity of the AI system, Future Horizon Academy has implemented measures to ensure that training data remain isolated from data that could lead to harmful or undesirable outcomes. The institution adds significant data elements as metadata, transforms the data into a format usable by the AI system, and uses data from one or more trusted sources.
Committed to standardization and continual improvement, Future Horizon Academy decided to implement an artificial intelligence management system (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001 that would help the institution increase operational efficiency, resulting in improved processes.
After having the AIMS in place for a year, the institution decided to apply for a certification audit to get certified against ISO/IEC 42001. Prior to the certification audit, the institution conducted an internal audit and management review to ensure that the AIMS aligns with the institution's own requirements and that the system is being maintained effectively.
Question:
Which of the following AI principles has Future Horizon Academy applied?
정답：C
설명：
Future Horizon Academy isolated its training data, ensured use of trusted sources, added metadata, and transformed data formats, directly supporting theReliability and Safetyprinciple. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 emphasizes in Clause 5.2 that an organization must ensure the reliability and safety of AI systems, especially regarding data integrity and handling risks arising from poor data quality.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 5.2 (AI Principles Application).
질문 # 124
Scenario 8 (continued):
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, theaudit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
After being recommended for certification (pending submission of corrective actions), InnovateSoft did not notify the auditor about completion of corrections and corrective actions.
Question:
Is this acceptable?
정답：A
설명：
The auditee mustformally inform the certification body(or designated auditor) once corrective actions are completed - even if no follow-up visit is required.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.3requires the auditor toreview evidence of correction and corrective actions, and the client is responsible for providing this.
* TheLead Auditor Manualemphasizes:"The audit team cannot confirm closure of nonconformities without documented evidence or confirmation from the auditee." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.3; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section 9 ("Audit Closure").
질문 # 125
......
PECB인증 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험을 패스하는 지름길은Fast2test에서 연구제작한 PECB 인증ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험대비 덤프를 마련하여 충분한 시험준비를 하는것입니다. 덤프는 PECB 인증ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험의 모든 범위가 포함되어 있어 시험적중율이 높습니다. PECB 인증ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험패는 바로 눈앞에 있습니다. 링크를 클릭하시고Fast2test의PECB 인증ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor시험대비 덤프를 장바구니에 담고 결제마친후 덤프를 받아 공부하는것입니다.
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor유효한 덤프공부: https://kr.fast2test.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-premium-file.html
